![]() ![]() It worked for me, but I can see readers more interested in superheroes than law feeling a bit unfulfilled. I quite enjoyed the setup - especially since the lawyer aspects felt so authentic. There is one other humorous action-based moment in the book, but it's only two panels, and again, while this works for the funny side of the book, it almost entirely ignores the expected action component. While the subsequent scene is perhaps funnier for that cutaway, the mix remains decidedly out of balance with no other opportunities for action in the book. The book cuts away during the one "action scene" before Jennifer even throws a punch. While these elements don't need to be equal by any means, there's very little of the "superhero" element here at all. In Soule's defense, the lawyer aspects of the book absolutely feel realistic, but the balance between "She-Hulk, attorney at law" and "She-Hulk, superhero at large" is off. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() As Wren helps Lincoln adjust to being back in the corporate world, they discover that Frederick had a lot of skeletons in his closet, ones that his mother never expected would be revealed. Lincoln and Wren butt heads in the beginning, but soon their relationship progresses from professional to physical and becomes one of attraction and mutual appreciation. With Frederick’s sudden death and Lincoln’s return, Gwendolyn makes her a new offer: “handle” both of her sons short term, and she would double her pay and introduce her to all the right connections to help get her charity started. So when Frederick and Gwendolyn Moorehead hired her as a “handler” to deal with their youngest son’s various indiscretions, she accepted, no questions asked. ![]() But she lacks two important things: the money and the connections. Wren Sterling has a goal: to start her own children’s charity in honor of her sibling that died when they were young. What he doesn’t expect is that he’s been assigned a handler, a woman who he finds extremely sexy but frustratingly annoying. When his father suddenly passes away, as the eldest son, Lincoln reluctantly returns home to New York City to inherit the family business-much to the chagrin of his younger brother, Armstrong. ![]() The next book set in Helena Hunting's hilarious and sexy world of Shacking Up!įor the last few years, Lincoln Moorehead has been working for non-profit organizations around the world. ![]() ![]() ![]() Realism-all-the-way-down does not throw out realism along with subjective and objective idealism, whereas contextualism throws out the whole lot. Although contextualism is compelling and comparable to realism-all-the-way-down, the latter does not throw out the baby the former throws out with the bathwater. The resulting realism-all-the-way-down is developed and compared with Richard Rorty's contextualism. ABSTRACT: In *Transcendence of Ego* and *Nausea*, drawing on Edmund Husserl and probably Friedrich Nietzsche, the young Jean-Paul Sartre rejected subjective and objective idealism. ![]() ![]() ![]() Editors: Kevin Hermberg and Paul Gyllenhammer. The argument is re-engaged and taken in the direction of virtue ethics in: "Descent to the Things Themselves: The Virtue of Dissent" - chapter for _Phenomenology and Virtue Ethics_. The paper is discussed in the work of Mary Edwards: The paper is critically discussed at length in Steven Hendley’s “Realism and Contingency: Elaborating a Viable Sartrean Response to Rorty’s Anti-Realism,” in *New Perspectives on Sartre*, edited by Adrian Mirvish and Adrian van den Hoven (Cambridge Scholars Publishing: September, 2010), pages161-177. ![]() |