![]() ![]() Realism-all-the-way-down does not throw out realism along with subjective and objective idealism, whereas contextualism throws out the whole lot. Although contextualism is compelling and comparable to realism-all-the-way-down, the latter does not throw out the baby the former throws out with the bathwater. The resulting realism-all-the-way-down is developed and compared with Richard Rorty's contextualism. ABSTRACT: In *Transcendence of Ego* and *Nausea*, drawing on Edmund Husserl and probably Friedrich Nietzsche, the young Jean-Paul Sartre rejected subjective and objective idealism. ![]() ![]() ![]() Editors: Kevin Hermberg and Paul Gyllenhammer. The argument is re-engaged and taken in the direction of virtue ethics in: "Descent to the Things Themselves: The Virtue of Dissent" - chapter for _Phenomenology and Virtue Ethics_. The paper is discussed in the work of Mary Edwards: The paper is critically discussed at length in Steven Hendley’s “Realism and Contingency: Elaborating a Viable Sartrean Response to Rorty’s Anti-Realism,” in *New Perspectives on Sartre*, edited by Adrian Mirvish and Adrian van den Hoven (Cambridge Scholars Publishing: September, 2010), pages161-177. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |